Well, it's Saturday and Playgirl.com has posted the Levi Johnston pics on their site.. but when I went to the site to see the pics and of course there was a membership of $20 for the month, I have to admit I paused. Why? I mean, what was I thinking? boy am I conditioned to get free porn! And why shouldn't we have to pay for porn? We pay for movies, television (cable), books, newspapers, etc.. what is about the pornographic nature of things that makes us expect that pics of naked people should be free?
In any event, ultimately I passed on paying although because I worry that Levi's little boy will go hungry (even though Palin on 20/20 tonight claimed that Johnston is 'making irresponsible choices right now'.. what, like buying a house for he and the kid?) I do encourage all of you reading this to go and get the membership. I may just break down but in the meantime, promoter Daniel Nardicio is teasing and taunting us on his Facebook page with some 'nice' pics of Levi to get people to .. uhm talk about the site. Hey, waitaminute... Ive just been played. Ah, whatever. :)
It does bring up something funny to me though - I love how gay porn stars are trying to get into mainstream anything and some mainstream celebs flock to doing porn in order to boost (or recreate or maybe in Levi's case, create) their career. Nobody's ever happy where they are but that's life I suppose.
A quick reminder that there are no frontal shots in the spread as was reported on Gawker earlier this week. But still, that's pretty nice photography (above). Reminds me of old Bob Mizer stuff from the 50s. Interesting. Well, enjoy!
Recent Comments